Why Wounded Knee Soldiers Keep Medals of Honor: A Difficult Discussion

The Controversy of Medals of Honor: Examining the Decision to Preserve Legacy

In a recent announcement that has stirred national debate, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth confirmed that the 20 soldiers who received the Medal of Honor for their actions during the Wounded Knee Massacre in 1890 will keep their medals. This decision comes after a lengthy review initiated by former Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, following recommendations from lawmakers urging the reconsideration of these awards. The Wounded Knee event, often referred to as a battle, is historically recognized not for valor but for the tragic loss of life, where an estimated 250 Native Americans were killed by U.S. troops amid a wider campaign to suppress Native American tribes.

Historical Context: What Happened at Wounded Knee?

The Wounded Knee Massacre took place on December 29, 1890, when the U.S. Army confronted a group of Lakota Sioux. The soldiers were under orders to disarm the Native Americans, but the encounter quickly turned deadly. The large number of casualties, including women and children, has led many historians to analyze this tragic moment as not simply a military engagement, but a genocide against the indigenous population. Despite calls for rescinding the medals initially awarded to the soldiers, Hegseth’s reaffirmation places a spotlight on ongoing conversations about historical narratives in America.

Military Honors and their Implications

The retention of the medals has sparked debate over the morality of honoring actions that may not align with contemporary values. Hegseth stated, "We're making it clear that (the soldiers) deserve those medals," which raises important questions: What criteria do we use to judge military valor? How historical context should influence our recognition of service? These questions resonate deeply, especially as ongoing discussions about racial inequality in America prompt a reevaluation of historical figures and events.

Social Impact: Why This Matters Today

The decision to uphold these medals has social implications, particularly for many Native Americans who feel marginalized by the ongoing commemoration of actions taken against their ancestors. In 1990, Congress formally apologized to the descendants of those who lost their lives at Wounded Knee. The failure to revoke the medals contrasts sharply with this apology and reflects an enduring tension in how U.S. history is remembered and honored.

Counterarguments: A Divided Perspective

While Hegseth’s announcement affirms the bravery of the soldiers involved, critics argue that uplifting such actions perpetuates harmful narratives. Some feel that the medals should be revoked as a way to honor the victims of the massacre rather than the perpetrators. Supporters of maintaining the medals contend that soldiers acted under the expectations of their time, reflecting the complex nature of warfare and duty. This duality illustrates the ongoing debate around how we reconcile past actions with current values.

Future Insights: Historical Reckoning and American Identity

This semblance of historical reckoning hints at a broader struggle within American identity. As society continues to wrestle with the implications of its past, discussions about monuments, military honors, and historical narratives become increasingly urgent. The inability to reconcile these elements may complicate efforts towards genuine reconciliation with Indigenous peoples. Hegseth’s decision propels this dialogue into the public sphere, urging Americans to consider what we choose to honor and forget.

Conclusion: What Can We Learn?

Pete Hegseth’s reaffirmation of the Medals of Honor awarded to soldiers at Wounded Knee underscores a pivotal moment in understanding American history and identity. As communities reckon with these narratives, it is essential to engage with history honestly, recognizing both valor and accountability. The conversation surrounding Wounded Knee is not just about retaining medals, but about embracing a richer understanding of our nation's past and the lessons it holds for present and future generations.

It is crucial for residents of Bakersfield and similar communities to stay informed about these discussions. Engaging with historical narratives allows us to advocate thoughtfully for justice and reconciliation.